CS492/CS692 S19 Course Structure
This page contains elaboration on the structure of the CS492/CS692
offering in Spring 2019, including sections on lectures, the marking
scheme, the late policy, assignments, role-playing exercises, and
plagiarism.
Lectures
Lectures are scheduled for two eighty-minute sessions per week, TuTh
8.30 -- 9:50, in PHY 150. The class will be run more like a
discussion seminar than a standard lecture. Students are expected to do
the preparatory readings, as listed in the timetable, in advance;
discussion will commence using those readings as a base. The
instructor may talk for a few minutes occasionally in order to set the
stage, make a technical point, summarize, or concentrate attention.
Student participation is important not only to facilitate the learning
process but also because marks are assessed for class participation.
Marking scheme
Final marks are based on:
- 60% assignments, the total out of 45 being scaled to a grade out of
60
- 20% the role playing exercise
- 20% class participation, based on
- discussion in class (most important)
- participation in discussion during RPEs
- discussion on newsgroup, including comments on RPEs
- feedback provided through Assignment
4B
Keep in mind that there is no midterm or final in the course.
Lateness policy
There is no lateness policy. That is: late assignments earn no credit.
Exceptions will be made in, well, exceptional circumstances, e.g., a
life-threatening illness.
Assignments
Assignments consist of written pieces of
varying length on class topics. Each assignment has a specified focused
subject or set of subjects from which to choose. Each of the first two
assignments is due at 10:00am on a Friday. Each of the last
three assignments is due at the start of a scheduled class.
Note that the electronic copies of your assignments may be subjected to
plagiarism checks.
All the assignments for the term are described on the Website by the
end of the first week of the term. It is up to you to plan your time
well in order to produce top quality assignments by the given due
dates. Be especially diligent around the time that midterms are
happening in your other courses.
There are no specific formatting requirements except the following:
-
Format the document with a 1-inch (2.54-cm) margin all around to allow
for comments from marker.
-
Make sure that your bibliographical citations are easy to track down. This
means giving full details about any
-
published book, including at least authors, title, date, and publisher,
-
published article, including at least authors, title, date, journal name, volume, issue, and page number,
-
Web document, including at least authors, title, date, and URL.
If a published book or article is available also through the Web, give also
its URL. See also Advice
on Referencing.
-
Distinguish clearly between a quotation and paraphrase.
-
Cite the source of any paraphrase or quotation at its beginning or end.
Role-playing exercises (RPE)
Two teams with, preferrably, two or, less preferrably, three students
each will assign themselves to a possible RPE. RPEs are conducted
weekly, starting on May 23, in the third week.
Your e-mail concerning choice of topics and formation of teams must be
sent by Thursday May 16, and will be handled on a first-come,
first-served basis.
We will make an effort to have the teams for the first two RPEs
finalized no later than Friday May 10.
Those who participate in the first two RPEs will be marked more
leniently than will the others.
Review the list of RPEs on the Website and then send mail to
ben.armstrong [AT] uwaterloo [DOT]
ca to indicate your preferences.
NOTE: Requests received before May 7 at 8:30am will be ignored.
By class time on May 16, anyone who has not yet sent e-mail to assign
him- or herself into an RPE will be assigned an RPE by the course
instructor and TAs.
The assignment of students to RPEs will be finalized by class time on
May 23, the date of the first RPE.
Check the RPE table
in the RPE page to find out where you have been placed.
Since RPE teams are finalized early in the term, it is once more up to
you to find appropriate times during the term to complete the required
preparation for the RPE, prior to its scheduled date, especially when
an assignment might be due on the same date and time as your RPE.
In an RPE, each of the two teams will take a different role or side, A
or B, of
the RPE's topic; the teams will typically have conflicting or opposing
views. The initial scenario for the two sides
of the RPE is outlined at the page describing the RPE.
The teams for an RPE have the latitude to
make adjustments to the initial scenario, including the exact wording
of each team's position. Both teams must agree with the final wording,
and the revisions must be approved by the TA. Thus, each of the two
teams should have a clear agreement as to the topic of the RPE. If the
teams elect to revise the wording of the scenario, they must post the
revised scenario to the appropriate section of the CS492 newsgroup
at Piazza no later than one week prior to the RPE.
Each team will prepare a position paper, from 1000 to 3000 words,
describing its views on the RPE's topic.
For RPEs held on a Thursday, the position paper is due at 4:00pm on the
Tuesday before the Thursday.
Preparing a position paper will generally involve background research;
it is also possible to conduct interviews with actual members of the
teams being represented. Teams will post their position papers to the
newsgroup. It is acceptable to post a link to a
site where the position paper resides. PDF or postscript is preferred
to Word documents. In addition, each team will deposit one hardcopy
of its position paper into the assignment box on the 4th floor of MC,
near MC 4066, no later than 5:00pm on the same day, the Tuesday
before the RPE. Follow the same formatting
instructions as for the Assignments.
Each other student is expected to read the final posted scenario
and position papers in preparation for the in-class RPE. A student may
want to post to the newsgroup some initial comments and questions
before the RPE. In some situations, it may be more appropriate to keep
questions and concerns for the actual RPE itself, so that we do not
exhaust all discussion prior to the RPE.
At the RPE, each team will briefly present its position in
six minutes maximum per team, and note that team A may not
necessarily be asked to start with their position before team B. These
presentations should not just repeat points made in the position
papers, but should lead naturally into the discussion to follow. The
class will then direct questions and comments to the teams, in a manner
similar to that of a public forum or press conference. Discussion of
whether the teams have depicted their roles accurately in their
position papers and presentations is also relevant. Please note that
this RPE is explicitly not a debate, and no vitriol should be
directed towards the other team. Instead, each team portrays a position
and adheres to that position. A period of four minutes, two
minutes per team, will be left at the end of the class for final words
from each team. This should be an effort to clearly articulate to the
audience the position being taken and its overall worth.
Please note that it is also important to allow each
team member an opportunity to demonstrate his or her skill in oral
communication, either in presenting part of the team's position, in
responding to questions from the audience during the discussion
session, or in delivering the final two minute summary.
Taking into account the points made in class, the teams are
required to produce, by 4:00pm the following Tuesday for a Thursday
RPE (and by 4:00 pm the following Friday for a Tuesday RPE), a joint
communique outlining what they can agree on and a common course of action,
as what happens following a Union Negotiation. This communique must be
posted to the newsgroup. We are looking for some effort to have the two
teams articulate clearly where they have found a middle ground. There
is no set limit for this document, but it is expected to be moderate in
size, on the order of a page.
After reading the joint communique, students who want to provide
feedback on the newsgroup should do so by 8:30am the Thursday following
the RPE for a Thursday RPE (and by 8:30am the Tuesday following the RPE
for a Tuesday RPE). A mark will be assigned to the teams, based on the
position papers, the discussion in class, and the final communique on
the basis of:
- effectiveness in oral and written communication,
- preparation and depth of treatment of the topic,
- content: how realistic or convincing the position is and how
clearly it has been articulated,
- how much progress has been made jointly, and
- how well each team has succeeded in making the joint
communique address their concerns.
The 20 marks for the RPE will break down as: 10 for oral
presentation, 8 for the position paper, and 2 for the joint
communique.
It is expected that all members on one team will receive the same
mark, but exceptional circumstances may be brought to the attention of
the TA or the instructor, so that team members who do not contribute
can potentially lose marks. The two teams presenting in a single RPE
date do not necessarily receive the same mark.
Any questions about assignments should be directed to
dberry [AT] uwaterloo [DOT] ca
for expediency with a required cc to the course e-mail address
cs492 [AT] student [DOT]
cs [DOT] waterloo [DOT] ca. Requests for RPEs are to be sent to Ben
at ben.armstrong [AT] uwaterloo [DOT]
ca. He will also answer questions about RPEs. Discussion about
RPEs should be posted to the appropriate section of the Piazza
newsgroup.
Plagiarism
As with all courses, it is understood that each students is to do
his or her own work unless otherwise instructed; that he or she must
acknowledge consultation with other people and texts; that
when he or she quotes from other sources, it should be brief and
relevant; that they should add value to the material they have
collected through further structuring and analysis. This is
particularly important in light of the use of the Web in this
course. Any violation of the
Student Academic Discipline Policy (Policy #71) will be
prosecuted. When in doubt, please consult the instructor or TA
for guidance.