| The marking scheme is divided in three sections. |
|
| Midterm Evaluation | Non-technical questions evaluated by your superior only. Week of February 21st |
| Peer Evaluation | Technical and non-technical questions evaluated by everyone on your team (usually 4-5 people). Week of March 21st. If there are no subordinates, the the 10 marks are distributed evenly to Superior and Colleagues. |
| Progress Tracking | Marked by HR on accuracy of content, and on-time delivery. Your VP's will soon post the schedule for the updates. They will vary for every team. |
| Team Deliverables / Success | Marked mostly after the project is finished, but some components will be marked throughout the term. Most components will be marked by the VP's or by the vice-president/president, but some components may be marked by HR or by Norm. |
| Organization Deliverables | These three components will be marked by Norm after the final product is submitted. HR will not specify any breakdown smaller than what is on the marking scheme. |
If you have any questions, concerns, or suggestions, please contact the VP's of Human Resources, or your president/vice-president, or Norm.
Professor: Norman Young
Team A:
President: Ronald Richardson
Vice-President: Mason Du
VP HR: Benoit Larochelle
Team B:
President: Jacob Fussek
Vice-President: Al Mithani
VP HR: Robb Effinger
If you change team: If you performed work for different teams, then make sure that the appropriate VP's talk to HR and you will get a mark that is related to all teams for which you worked. Most likely, HR will give you a weighted average of the team marks obtained by these teams.
See the generic marking scheme (See the small differences in 'Personal' and 'Team' levels below)
See the midterm evaluation (Soft skills, so same questionnaire for everyone)
The peer evaluation consists of the the same questions as in the midterm evalution, in addition to job specific questions. Click on the links below to see these specific questions.